Vegas Matt banned from the Venetian for "advantage play

Just when Matt believed casino influencers were making strides in how they showcase their online personalities, he faced a setback when the Venetian in Las Vegas banned him. Matt confirmed this development himself by responding to a post from Vital Vegas on X. Vital Vegas reported that Matt had been 86’d from the Venetian without any reason given, though they suggested it was due to advantage play that earned him six figures. Matt had a slightly different take on the situation. He explained that The Venetian escorted him out after his team won $400,000. He mentioned he was playing a Phoenix Link slot machine, stating that his only advantage play was walking away with more money than he started with, which he noted is hardly advantage play. Maybe they just didn’t like me winning, he remarked, adding that he had better options available: Their loss. I prefer giving my business to properties that are happy when I just win.

Matt has recently pointed out that casinos are starting to embrace casino influencers, recognizing their crucial role in attracting business. Properties are even reaching out to him to host events, making Matt feel more at ease with the situation. Vital Vegas's social media account indicated that banning someone like Vegas Matt could pose a disadvantage, even for a high-profile venue like The Venetian. In responses to comments, Vital Vegas clarified that casinos aren't required to disclose the exact reason for asking someone to leave. As local reporters noted, casinos have the right to deny access to virtually anyone. One commenter also questioned the idea of advantage play at a slot machine, which contradicts the fundamental nature of slot gaming. It's not uncommon for casinos to refuse service even without evidence of misconduct. For instance, Dana White, the UFC boss, often places high bets on baccarat and leaves after a significant win, not allowing the casino the chance to reclaim their losses.